Redmi 14C vs Samsung Galaxy A17

The Redmi 14C (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99; launch prices were $120 and $147. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A17 leads — 45/100 vs 31/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi 14C has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the Samsung Galaxy A17 is faster in AnTuTu (554,590 vs 358,608).

The Samsung Galaxy A17 is noticeably better than the Redmi 14C — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi 14C

Performance 30
Display 43
Camera 13
Battery 46
Portability 55
Value for money 44

Samsung Galaxy A17

Performance 43
Display 67
Camera 33
Battery 44
Portability 70
Value for money 66

What makes Redmi 14C better?

  • Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
  • Cheaper at launch: $120 vs $147

  • Longer battery life (46/100 vs 44/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy A17 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 554590 vs 358608
  • Better Geekbench Single: 727 vs 432
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2047 vs 1416
  • Faster charging: 25W vs 18W
  • Lighter: 190g vs 204g

  • Higher performance (43/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better camera (33/100 vs 13/100)
  • Better display (67/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better portability (70/100 vs 55/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi 14C vs the Samsung Galaxy A17, the Samsung Galaxy A17 scores 14 points higher (45/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 leads (43/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 leads (33/100 vs 13/100). Value score: Redmi 14C — 44/100, Samsung Galaxy A17 — 66/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (67/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (33/100 vs 13/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi 14C and the Samsung Galaxy A17 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (70/100 vs 55/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi 14C Samsung Galaxy A17
Processor MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra MediaTek Helio G99
AnTuTu 358608 554590
Geekbench Single 432 727
Geekbench Multi 1416 2047
Display 6.9" IPS LCD 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 720x1640 1080x2340
Refresh rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W 25W
DXOMark (camera) 63 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 5 MP
Front camera 13 MP 13 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 14, HyperOS Android 15 / One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 600 nits 800 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP54
Dimensions 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm
Weight 204 g 190 g
Launch price $120 $147

Camera comparison

Redmi 14C

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
13
camera

Samsung Galaxy A17

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera

Display comparison

Redmi 14C

  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1640
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display

Samsung Galaxy A17

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display

Battery and charging

Redmi 14C

  • 5160 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Samsung Galaxy A17

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi 14C and Samsung Galaxy A17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi 14C MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra
31/100
358608 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A17 MediaTek Helio G99
45/100 +35.3%
554590 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy A17 leads Redmi 14C by 35.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi 14C

$120

Samsung Galaxy A17

$147

Launch price difference: $27. Redmi 14C was $27 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (67/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (33/100 vs 13/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi 14C and the Samsung Galaxy A17 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (70/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi 14C or the Samsung Galaxy A17?

The Samsung Galaxy A17 is noticeably better than the Redmi 14C — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the Redmi 14C and the Samsung Galaxy A17?

The Redmi 14C has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 — 45/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi 14C or the Samsung Galaxy A17?

The Samsung Galaxy A17 leads on camera score (33/100 vs 13/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi 14C or the Samsung Galaxy A17?

The Samsung Galaxy A17 leads on performance (43/100 vs 30/100).

Should you choose the Redmi 14C over the Samsung Galaxy A17?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Samsung Galaxy A17 (67/100 vs 43/100).