Redmi 13 5G vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The Redmi 13 5G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 AE, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 49/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5030); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi 13 5G is noticeably lighter (205g vs 227g).
Redmi 13 5G
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 205g vs 227g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 35/100)
- Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5030 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (78/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 47/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Redmi 13 5G vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 40 points higher (89/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 13 5G (99/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 13 5G (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 13 5G (92/100 vs 47/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi 13 5G notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (53/100 vs 35/100).
| Specification | Redmi 13 5G | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 AE | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 4602290 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5030 mAh | 7400 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS, up to 2 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 550 nits | 8000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP53 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 168.6×76.3×8.3 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | — | $799 |
Redmi 13 5G
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi 13 5G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Redmi 13 5G
- 5030 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Redmi 13 5G
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 13 5G (99/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 13 5G (78/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 13 5G (92/100 vs 47/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi 13 5G notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (53/100 vs 35/100).
Which is better: the Redmi 13 5G or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 13 5G by 40 points (89/100 vs 49/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi 13 5G and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Redmi 13 5G has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi 13 5G or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Redmi 13 5G over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Redmi 13 5G is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.