Redmi 11A vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
Comparing the Redmi 11A (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G leads — 26/100 vs 16/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 11A doesn't.
Redmi 11A
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Overall rating 16/100
- Faster charging: 25W vs 10W
- Better camera (28/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (99/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Redmi 11A vs the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G scores 10 points higher (26/100 vs 16/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G significantly outperforms the Redmi 11A (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and the Redmi 11A are nearly equal (28/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and the Redmi 11A are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is a bit better (62/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G significantly outperforms the Redmi 11A (99/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Redmi 11A | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 548631 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB / 4GB / 6GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | — | 190 g | |
| Price | — | $153 |
Redmi 11A
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Redmi 11A
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Redmi 11A
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Redmi 11A
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G significantly outperforms the Redmi 11A (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and the Redmi 11A are nearly equal (28/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G and the Redmi 11A are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is a bit better (62/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G significantly outperforms the Redmi 11A (99/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Redmi 11A or the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is noticeably better than the Redmi 11A — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Redmi 11A and the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Redmi 11A has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G — 26/100.
Should you choose the Redmi 11A over the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Redmi 11A is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.