Redmi 11A vs Redmi Turbo 5
Comparing the Redmi 11A (2022) and the Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 54/100 vs 16/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi Turbo 5 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 11A doesn't.
Redmi 11A
Redmi Turbo 5
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 45/100)
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 10W
- Higher performance (43/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (32/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (72/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (93/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Redmi 11A vs the Redmi Turbo 5, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 38 points higher (54/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (72/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Redmi 11A (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Redmi 11A (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (32/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Redmi 11A (72/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi 11A is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Redmi 11A (93/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Redmi 11A | Redmi Turbo 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2809170 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1553 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 6403 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 2756x1268 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7560 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB / 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 204 g | |
| Price | — | $250 |
Redmi 11A
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 5MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Redmi 11A
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi 11A
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Redmi 11A
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Redmi 11A (43/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Redmi 11A (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (32/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Redmi 11A (72/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi 11A is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Redmi 11A (93/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Redmi 11A or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Redmi 11A by 38 points (54/100 vs 16/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi 11A and the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi 11A has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 — 54/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi 11A or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on camera score (32/100 vs 24/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi 11A or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (43/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Redmi 11A over the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi 11A is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.