Realme X3 SuperZoom vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7

The Realme X3 SuperZoom (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads — 75/100 vs 51/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has the bigger battery (4400 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 859,084); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme X3 SuperZoom doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is thinner (4.2mm vs 8.9mm).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Realme X3 SuperZoom by 24 points (75/100 vs 51/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Realme X3 SuperZoom
Performance 55
Display 70
Camera 51
Battery 28
Portability 48
Value for money
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Performance 91
Display 78
Camera 76
Battery 39
Portability 66
Value for money 54
What makes Realme X3 SuperZoom better?
  • Faster charging: 30W vs 25W
  • Lighter: 202g vs 215g

  • Overall rating 51/100
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 859084
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 1031
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 2864
  • Bigger battery: 4400 vs 4200 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (76/100 vs 51/100)
  • Longer battery life (39/100 vs 28/100)
  • Better display (78/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 48/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Realme X3 SuperZoom vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 scores 24 points higher (75/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads (39/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Realme X3 SuperZoom (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a bit better (78/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 notably outperforms the Realme X3 SuperZoom (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a bit better (39/100 vs 28/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 notably outperforms the Realme X3 SuperZoom (66/100 vs 48/100).

Realme X3 SuperZoom: The Realme X3 SuperZoom is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Realme X3 SuperZoom Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 859084 3065623
Geekbench Single 1031 2910
Geekbench Multi 2864 9174
Display 6.0" IPS LCD 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1080x2400 2184x1968
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4200 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 30W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 145
Main camera 64 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 8 MP 10 MP
Front camera 32 MP 10 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 10, Realme UI Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 163.8×75.8×8.9 mm 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm
Weight 202 g 215 g
Launch price $1999
Camera comparison
Realme X3 SuperZoom
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
51
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera
Display comparison
Realme X3 SuperZoom
  • 6.0" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
70
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display
Battery and charging
Realme X3 SuperZoom
  • 4200 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • No wireless charging
28
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Realme X3 SuperZoom and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Realme X3 SuperZoom Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+
51/100
859084 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
75/100 +72.0%
3065623 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads Realme X3 SuperZoom by 72.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Realme X3 SuperZoom
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
$1999
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Realme X3 SuperZoom (91/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a bit better (78/100 vs 70/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 notably outperforms the Realme X3 SuperZoom (76/100 vs 51/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a bit better (39/100 vs 28/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 notably outperforms the Realme X3 SuperZoom (66/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Realme X3 SuperZoom or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Realme X3 SuperZoom by 24 points (75/100 vs 51/100).

What is the rating of the Realme X3 SuperZoom and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Realme X3 SuperZoom has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — 75/100.

Which has the better camera: the Realme X3 SuperZoom or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 51/100).

Which is more powerful: the Realme X3 SuperZoom or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads on performance (91/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Realme X3 SuperZoom over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Realme X3 SuperZoom is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.