Realme Neo7 Turbo vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

The Realme Neo7 Turbo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400e, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $270 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme Neo7 Turbo leads — 70/100 vs 65/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Neo7 Turbo has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 4400); the Realme Neo7 Turbo is faster in AnTuTu (2,502,910 vs 1,818,396); the Realme Neo7 Turbo is noticeably lighter (205g vs 253g).

The Realme Neo7 Turbo edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Realme Neo7 Turbo
Performance 84
Display 84
Camera 35
Battery 85
Portability 50
Value for money 88
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Performance 76
Display 78
Camera 63
Battery 39
Portability 52
Value for money 34
What makes Realme Neo7 Turbo better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2502910 vs 1818396
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2233 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 7478 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 7200 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Lighter: 205g vs 253g
  • Cheaper at launch: $270 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (84/100 vs 76/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 better?

  • Better camera (63/100 vs 35/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Realme Neo7 Turbo vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5, the Realme Neo7 Turbo scores 5 points higher (70/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 leads (63/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo leads (85/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Realme Neo7 Turbo — 88/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 — 34/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 Turbo (63/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (85/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 and the Realme Neo7 Turbo are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).

Realme Neo7 Turbo: The Realme Neo7 Turbo is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Realme Neo7 Turbo Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9400e Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 2502910 1818396
Geekbench Single 2233 2004
Geekbench Multi 7478 5311
Display 6.8" AMOLED 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1280x2800 2176x1812
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7200 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 100W 25W
Wireless charging 15W
DXOMark (camera) 128
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 16 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 6500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IPX8
Dimensions 162.4×76.1×8.6 mm 154.9×129.9×6.1 mm
Weight 205 g 253 g
Launch price $270 $1799
Camera comparison
Realme Neo7 Turbo
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
63
camera
Display comparison
Realme Neo7 Turbo
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1280x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
  • 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2176x1812
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display
Battery and charging
Realme Neo7 Turbo
  • 7200 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless charging: no data
85
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Realme Neo7 Turbo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Realme Neo7 Turbo MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
70/100
2502910 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
65/100 -37.6%
1818396 AnTuTu

Realme Neo7 Turbo leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 by 37.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Realme Neo7 Turbo
$270
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
$1799

Launch price difference: $1529. Realme Neo7 Turbo was $1529 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 Turbo (63/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (85/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 and the Realme Neo7 Turbo are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Realme Neo7 Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

The Realme Neo7 Turbo edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Realme Neo7 Turbo and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

The Realme Neo7 Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the Realme Neo7 Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 leads on camera score (63/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Realme Neo7 Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

The Realme Neo7 Turbo leads on performance (84/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Realme Neo7 Turbo over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

The Realme Neo7 Turbo is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 is a better fit for active users.