Realme Neo7 SE vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Realme Neo7 SE (2025) runs on the Dimensity 8400 Max, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $260 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 64/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 7000); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 2,081,324); the Realme Neo7 SE is noticeably lighter (212g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme Neo7 SE by 25 points (89/100 vs 64/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Realme Neo7 SE

Performance 77
Display 84
Camera 35
Battery 68
Portability 46
Value for money 76

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes Realme Neo7 SE better?

  • Lighter: 212g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $260 vs $799

  • Better portability (46/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 2081324
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1579
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6100
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 7000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 77/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 84/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Realme Neo7 SE vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 25 points higher (89/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Realme Neo7 SE — 76/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 SE (99/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 SE (99/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme Neo7 SE (78/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 SE (92/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme Neo7 SE is a bit better (46/100 vs 35/100).

Realme Neo7 SE: The Realme Neo7 SE is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Realme Neo7 SE Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Dimensity 8400 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2081324 4602290
Geekbench Single 1579 3639
Geekbench Multi 6100 11047
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1264x2780 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 80W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 6000 nits 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP68
Dimensions 162.5×76.3×8.6 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 212 g 227 g
Launch price $260 $799

Camera comparison

Realme Neo7 SE

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Realme Neo7 SE

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1264x2780
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Realme Neo7 SE

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
68
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Realme Neo7 SE and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Realme Neo7 SE Dimensity 8400 Max
64/100
2081324 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +54.8%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Realme Neo7 SE by 54.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Realme Neo7 SE

$260

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $539. Realme Neo7 SE was $539 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 SE (99/100 vs 77/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 SE (99/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme Neo7 SE (78/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 SE (92/100 vs 68/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Realme Neo7 SE is a bit better (46/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Realme Neo7 SE or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme Neo7 SE by 25 points (89/100 vs 64/100).

What is the rating of the Realme Neo7 SE and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Realme Neo7 SE has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Realme Neo7 SE or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Realme Neo7 SE or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 77/100).

Should you choose the Realme Neo7 SE over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Realme Neo7 SE is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.