Realme Narzo N53 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Realme Narzo N53 (2023) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T612, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 34/100 (a 53-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme Narzo N53 doesn't; the Realme Narzo N53 is noticeably lighter (182g vs 226g).
Realme Narzo N53
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 182g vs 226g
- Better portability (75/100 vs 43/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 360
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1250
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 16/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the Realme Narzo N53 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 53 points higher (87/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo N53 (93/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo N53 (84/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo N53 (81/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme Narzo N53 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (75/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Realme Narzo N53 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc Tiger T612 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 360 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1250 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI T | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 450 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 167.3×76.7×7.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 182 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Realme Narzo N53
- Main: —
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Realme Narzo N53
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme Narzo N53
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Realme Narzo N53
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo N53 (93/100 vs 16/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo N53 (84/100 vs 54/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo N53 (81/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Realme Narzo N53 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (75/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Realme Narzo N53 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo N53 by 53 points (87/100 vs 34/100).
What is the rating of the Realme Narzo N53 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Realme Narzo N53 has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which is more powerful: the Realme Narzo N53 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 16/100).
Should you choose the Realme Narzo N53 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Realme Narzo N53 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.