Realme Narzo 50A Prime vs Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
The Realme Narzo 50A Prime (2022) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T612, while the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads — 31/100 vs 17/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Realme Narzo 50A Prime is thinner (8.1mm vs 9.2mm).
Realme Narzo 50A Prime
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Lighter: 189g vs 203g
- Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 46/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 44W vs 18W
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Realme Narzo 50A Prime vs the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022), the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) scores 14 points higher (31/100 vs 17/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50A Prime (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Realme Narzo 50A Prime are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 50A Prime (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 50A Prime notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Realme Narzo 50A Prime | Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc Tiger T612 | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | |
| AnTuTu | 200000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 360 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1250 | — | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×75.6×8.1 mm | 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 203 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Realme Narzo 50A Prime
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Realme Narzo 50A Prime
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme Narzo 50A Prime
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50A Prime (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Realme Narzo 50A Prime are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 50A Prime (51/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 50A Prime notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (63/100 vs 46/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Realme Narzo 50A Prime or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is noticeably better than the Realme Narzo 50A Prime — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Realme Narzo 50A Prime and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Realme Narzo 50A Prime has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) — 31/100.
Should you choose the Realme Narzo 50A Prime over the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Realme Narzo 50A Prime is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a better fit for everyday use.