Realme Narzo 50 Pro vs ZTE Blade V50 Vita
The Realme Narzo 50 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920, while the ZTE Blade V50 Vita (2023) runs on the Unisoc T606. Both devices score the same overall rating of 25/100. Key differences: the ZTE Blade V50 Vita has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the ZTE Blade V50 Vita has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro doesn't; the Realme Narzo 50 Pro is noticeably lighter (181g vs 204g).
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
ZTE Blade V50 Vita
- Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
- Lighter: 181g vs 204g
- Better camera (29/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (73/100 vs 45/100)
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Longer battery life (42/100 vs 39/100)
- Better value for money (95/100 vs 55/100)
The Realme Narzo 50 Pro and the ZTE Blade V50 Vita received the same MobileRank rating — 25/100. In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita leads (95/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "camera" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro is a bit better (29/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita and the Realme Narzo 50 Pro are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 Vita (73/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (95/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Realme Narzo 50 Pro | ZTE Blade V50 Vita | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 330006 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.4" Super AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 13 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 160.2×73.3×8.0 mm | 167.4×76.0×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 181 g | 204 g | |
| Price | — | $210 |
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade V50 Vita
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- 6.4" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Blade V50 Vita
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V50 Vita
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro is a bit better (29/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita and the Realme Narzo 50 Pro are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 Vita (73/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (95/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Realme Narzo 50 Pro or the ZTE Blade V50 Vita?
Both devices scored 25/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the ZTE Blade V50 Vita.
What is the rating of the Realme Narzo 50 Pro and the ZTE Blade V50 Vita?
The Realme Narzo 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme Narzo 50 Pro or the ZTE Blade V50 Vita?
The Realme Narzo 50 Pro leads on camera score (29/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Realme Narzo 50 Pro over the ZTE Blade V50 Vita?
The Realme Narzo 50 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade V50 Vita is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.