Realme Narzo 50 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
The Realme Narzo 50 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G leads — 26/100 vs 25/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro doesn't.
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Faster charging: 33W vs 25W
- Lighter: 181g vs 190g
- Better camera (29/100 vs 28/100)
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 37/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (73/100 vs 62/100)
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Better value for money (99/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Realme Narzo 50 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G scores 1 points higher (26/100 vs 25/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "camera" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G are nearly equal (29/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro is a bit better (73/100 vs 62/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Realme Narzo 50 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 548631 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.4" Super AMOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 160.2×73.3×8.0 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 181 g | 190 g | |
| Price | — | $153 |
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- 6.4" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G are nearly equal (29/100 vs 28/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro is a bit better (73/100 vs 62/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Realme Narzo 50 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G edges out the Realme Narzo 50 Pro by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme Narzo 50 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Realme Narzo 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G — 26/100.
Should you choose the Realme Narzo 50 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G?
The Realme Narzo 50 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A17 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.