Realme Narzo 100 Lite vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Realme Narzo 100 Lite (2026) runs on the Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $170 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 40/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Narzo 100 Lite has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 524,785); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme Narzo 100 Lite doesn't.
Realme Narzo 100 Lite
Vivo X300 Pro
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6510 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 212g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $170 vs $899
- Better portability (48/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 90W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 55/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 65/100)
Comparing the Realme Narzo 100 Lite vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 47 points higher (87/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 55/100). Value score: Realme Narzo 100 Lite — 50/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 100 Lite (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 100 Lite (84/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 100 Lite (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 100 Lite (81/100 vs 55/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme Narzo 100 Lite is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Realme Narzo 100 Lite | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 6300 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1570 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / realme UI 7.0 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 900 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.3×78.1×8.4 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 212 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $170 | $899 |
Realme Narzo 100 Lite
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Realme Narzo 100 Lite
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1570
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme Narzo 100 Lite
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Realme Narzo 100 Lite and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Realme Narzo 100 Lite by 84.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $729. Realme Narzo 100 Lite was $729 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 100 Lite (93/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 100 Lite (84/100 vs 65/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 100 Lite (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 100 Lite (81/100 vs 55/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Realme Narzo 100 Lite is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Realme Narzo 100 Lite or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 100 Lite by 47 points (87/100 vs 40/100).
What is the rating of the Realme Narzo 100 Lite and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Realme Narzo 100 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 40/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme Narzo 100 Lite or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Realme Narzo 100 Lite or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Realme Narzo 100 Lite over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Realme Narzo 100 Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.