Realme GT7 Pro vs ZTE Axon 60
The Realme GT7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Axon 60 (2024) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T616. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme GT7 Pro leads — 76/100 vs 36/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Realme GT7 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000).
Realme GT7 Pro
ZTE Axon 60
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 400
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1350
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 5W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 19/100)
- Better camera (56/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Realme GT7 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 60, the Realme GT7 Pro scores 40 points higher (76/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT7 Pro leads (92/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme GT7 Pro leads (56/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT7 Pro leads (74/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT7 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 (92/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the Realme GT7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme GT7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 (56/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT7 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 (74/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 60 notably outperforms the Realme GT7 Pro (54/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Realme GT7 Pro | ZTE Axon 60 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Unisoc Tiger T616 | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 400 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 1350 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.5×76.9×8.6 mm | 166.3×77.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 222 g | — | |
| Price | $650 | — |
Realme GT7 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 60
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Realme GT7 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 60
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Realme GT7 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 60
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 60
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Realme GT7 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 (92/100 vs 19/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Realme GT7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 (84/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Realme GT7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 (56/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme GT7 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 (74/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 60 notably outperforms the Realme GT7 Pro (54/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Realme GT7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 60?
The Realme GT7 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 by 40 points (76/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Realme GT7 Pro and the ZTE Axon 60?
The Realme GT7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the ZTE Axon 60 — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme GT7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 60?
The Realme GT7 Pro leads on camera score (56/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Realme GT7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 60?
The Realme GT7 Pro leads on performance (92/100 vs 19/100).
Should you choose the Realme GT7 Pro over the ZTE Axon 60?
The Realme GT7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users. The ZTE Axon 60 is a better fit for everyday use.