Realme GT7 Pro Racing vs Vivo iQOO 15R
The Realme GT7 Pro Racing (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO 15R (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15R leads — 73/100 vs 70/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Realme GT7 Pro Racing is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 2,824,644); the Vivo iQOO 15R is noticeably lighter (197g vs 218g).
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
Vivo iQOO 15R
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 2824644
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 70/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9494
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 197g vs 218g
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 92/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (62/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Realme GT7 Pro Racing vs the Vivo iQOO 15R, the Vivo iQOO 15R scores 3 points higher (73/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R and the Realme GT7 Pro Racing are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 35/100. In the "battery" category, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing and the Vivo iQOO 15R are nearly equal (74/100 vs 70/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R notably outperforms the Realme GT7 Pro Racing (62/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Realme GT7 Pro Racing | Vivo iQOO 15R | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 2824644 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.5×76.9×8.6 mm | 157.6×74.4×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 218 g | 197 g | |
| Price | — | $450 |
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO 15R
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15R
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15R
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared Realme GT7 Pro Racing and Vivo iQOO 15R, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Realme GT7 Pro Racing leads Vivo iQOO 15R by 10.4% in our overall performance rating.
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R and the Realme GT7 Pro Racing are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 35/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing and the Vivo iQOO 15R are nearly equal (74/100 vs 70/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15R notably outperforms the Realme GT7 Pro Racing (62/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Realme GT7 Pro Racing or the Vivo iQOO 15R?
The Vivo iQOO 15R edges out the Realme GT7 Pro Racing by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme GT7 Pro Racing and the Vivo iQOO 15R?
The Realme GT7 Pro Racing has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Vivo iQOO 15R — 73/100.
Should you choose the Realme GT7 Pro Racing over the Vivo iQOO 15R?
The Realme GT7 Pro Racing is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 15R is a better fit for gamers and power users.