Realme GT7 Pro Racing vs Redmi K90
The Realme GT7 Pro Racing (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Redmi K90 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 leads — 76/100 vs 70/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 6500); the Realme GT7 Pro Racing is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 3,088,357).
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
Redmi K90
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 3088357
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 72/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 6500 mAh
- Lighter: 206g vs 218g
- Better camera (58/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Realme GT7 Pro Racing vs the Redmi K90, the Redmi K90 scores 6 points higher (76/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 leads (58/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100. In the "display" category, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing and the Redmi K90 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 notably outperforms the Realme GT7 Pro Racing (58/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing and the Redmi K90 are nearly equal (74/100 vs 72/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi K90 is a bit better (55/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Realme GT7 Pro Racing | Redmi K90 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 3088357 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 2510x1156 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.5×76.9×8.6 mm | 157.5×75.3×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 218 g | 206 g | |
| Price | — | $401 |
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi K90
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K90
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2510x1156
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K90
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared Realme GT7 Pro Racing and Redmi K90, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Realme GT7 Pro Racing leads Redmi K90 by 1.0% in our overall performance rating.
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing and the Redmi K90 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 notably outperforms the Realme GT7 Pro Racing (58/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing and the Redmi K90 are nearly equal (74/100 vs 72/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi K90 is a bit better (55/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Realme GT7 Pro Racing or the Redmi K90?
The Redmi K90 edges out the Realme GT7 Pro Racing by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme GT7 Pro Racing and the Redmi K90?
The Realme GT7 Pro Racing has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Redmi K90 — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme GT7 Pro Racing or the Redmi K90?
The Redmi K90 leads on camera score (58/100 vs 35/100).
Should you choose the Realme GT7 Pro Racing over the Redmi K90?
The Realme GT7 Pro Racing is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Redmi K90 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.