Realme GT7 (China) vs Vivo S60e
The Realme GT7 (China) (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+, while the Vivo S60e (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme GT7 (China) leads — 71/100 vs 65/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Realme GT7 (China) is faster in AnTuTu (2,835,794 vs 1,176,492).
Realme GT7 (China)
Vivo S60e
- Higher AnTuTu: 2835794 vs 1176492
- Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 1224
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8430 vs 3470
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 62/100)
- Lighter: 196g vs 203g
- Better camera (44/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 72/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the Realme GT7 (China) vs the Vivo S60e, the Realme GT7 (China) scores 6 points higher (71/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT7 (China) leads (89/100 vs 62/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S60e leads (83/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT7 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo S60e (89/100 vs 62/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo S60e is a bit better (44/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S60e is a bit better (83/100 vs 72/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S60e is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Realme GT7 (China) | Vivo S60e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | MediaTek Dimensity 7500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2835794 | 1176492 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2729 | 1224 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8430 | 3470 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2800 | 1260x2750 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7200 mAh | 7200 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×76.0×8.3 mm | 157.5×74.3×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 203 g | 196 g | |
| Launch price | — | $400 |
Realme GT7 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo S60e
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Realme GT7 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo S60e
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2750
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Realme GT7 (China)
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo S60e
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Realme GT7 (China) and Vivo S60e, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Realme GT7 (China) leads Vivo S60e by 141.0% in our overall performance rating.
Realme GT7 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Realme GT7 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo S60e (89/100 vs 62/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S60e is a bit better (44/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo S60e is a bit better (83/100 vs 72/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo S60e is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Realme GT7 (China) or the Vivo S60e?
The Realme GT7 (China) edges out the Vivo S60e by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme GT7 (China) and the Vivo S60e?
The Realme GT7 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Vivo S60e — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme GT7 (China) or the Vivo S60e?
The Vivo S60e leads on camera score (44/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Realme GT7 (China) or the Vivo S60e?
The Realme GT7 (China) leads on performance (89/100 vs 62/100).
Should you choose the Realme GT7 (China) over the Vivo S60e?
The Realme GT7 (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo S60e is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.