Realme GT5 vs Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
The Realme GT5 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme GT5 leads — 65/100 vs 64/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Realme GT5 has the bigger battery (5240 mAh vs 4800); the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 is faster in AnTuTu (1,991,672 vs 1,700,000); the Realme GT5 is noticeably lighter (205g vs 255g).
Realme GT5
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
- Bigger battery: 5240 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 150W vs 67W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 205g vs 255g
- Longer battery life (69/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 77/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1991672 vs 1700000
- Higher performance (77/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (42/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 46/100)
Comparing the Realme GT5 vs the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3, the Realme GT5 scores 1 points higher (65/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 and the Realme GT5 are nearly equal (77/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Realme GT5 notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (94/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 is a bit better (42/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT5 is a bit better (69/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
| Specification | Realme GT5 | Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 1700000 | 1991672 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 2004 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 5311 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 8.0" Foldable LTPO OLED+ | |
| Resolution | 1240x2772 | 1916x2160 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5240 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 150W | 67W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×75.4×8.9 mm | 161.2×143.3×5.3 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 255 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Realme GT5
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 20MP
Realme GT5
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1240x2772
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
- 8.0" Foldable LTPO OLED+
- Resolution: 1916x2160
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme GT5
- 5240 mAh
- Wired: 150W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Realme GT5 and Xiaomi Mix Fold 3, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 leads Realme GT5 by 14.6% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 and the Realme GT5 are nearly equal (77/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Realme GT5 notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (94/100 vs 77/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 is a bit better (42/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme GT5 is a bit better (69/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
Which is better: the Realme GT5 or the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?
The Realme GT5 edges out the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme GT5 and the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?
The Realme GT5 has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme GT5 or the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?
The Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 leads on camera score (42/100 vs 35/100).
Should you choose the Realme GT5 over the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?
The Realme GT5 is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 is a better fit for active users.