Realme GT Neo 5 240W vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 61/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,420,808); the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is noticeably lighter (199g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Realme GT Neo 5 240W better?
- Faster charging: 240W vs 90W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 226g
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (50/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1420808
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4600 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Realme GT Neo 5 240W vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 27 points higher (88/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (94/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Realme GT Neo 5 240W | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1420808 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1240x2772 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 240W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.9×75.8×8.9 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1240x2772
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 240W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Realme GT Neo 5 240W and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Realme GT Neo 5 240W by 57.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (94/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (96/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (81/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Realme GT Neo 5 240W or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W by 27 points (88/100 vs 61/100).
What is the rating of the Realme GT Neo 5 240W and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme GT Neo 5 240W or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Realme GT Neo 5 240W or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Realme GT Neo 5 240W over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.