Realme GT 2 Pro vs Vivo X300
The Realme GT 2 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1, while the Vivo X300 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 leads — 62/100 vs 37/100 (a 25-point difference).
Realme GT 2 Pro
Vivo X300
- Lighter: 199g vs 206g
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 42/100)
- Faster charging: 80W vs 65W
- Higher performance (47/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (74/100 vs 54/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 47/100)
- Better value for money (75/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Realme GT 2 Pro vs the Vivo X300, the Vivo X300 scores 25 points higher (62/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 leads (47/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 leads (74/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 leads (75/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 significantly outperforms the Realme GT 2 Pro (47/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Realme GT 2 Pro (74/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 and the Realme GT 2 Pro are nearly equal (51/100 vs 47/100). In the "design" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Realme GT 2 Pro (75/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Realme GT 2 Pro | Vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2555121 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 2142 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 7125 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 65W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 150.6×71.9×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 206 g | |
| Price | — | $499 |
Realme GT 2 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Realme GT 2 Pro
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme GT 2 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Realme GT 2 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 significantly outperforms the Realme GT 2 Pro (47/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Realme GT 2 Pro (74/100 vs 54/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 and the Realme GT 2 Pro are nearly equal (51/100 vs 47/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Realme GT 2 Pro (75/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Realme GT 2 Pro or the Vivo X300?
The Vivo X300 significantly outperforms the Realme GT 2 Pro by 25 points (62/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Realme GT 2 Pro and the Vivo X300?
The Realme GT 2 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Vivo X300 — 62/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme GT 2 Pro or the Vivo X300?
The Vivo X300 leads on camera score (74/100 vs 54/100).
Which is more powerful: the Realme GT 2 Pro or the Vivo X300?
The Vivo X300 leads on performance (47/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Realme GT 2 Pro over the Vivo X300?
The Realme GT 2 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.