Realme C65 5G vs Vivo Y77 (China)
The Realme C65 5G (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads — 45/100 vs 42/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Realme C65 5G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the Vivo Y77 (China) is faster in AnTuTu (593,307 vs 528,398).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Realme C65 5G
Vivo Y77 (China)
What makes Realme C65 5G better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Lighter: 190g vs 194g
- Better portability (66/100 vs 56/100)
What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 593307 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 915 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2299 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 80W vs 15W
- Higher performance (47/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Realme C65 5G vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Vivo Y77 (China) scores 3 points higher (45/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Realme C65 5G are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (66/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Realme C65 5G are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme C65 5G is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Realme C65 5G | Vivo Y77 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | |
| AnTuTu | 528398 | 593307 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 915 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 2299 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1604 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 625 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 165.6×76.1×7.9 mm | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Realme C65 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Realme C65 5G
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1604
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Realme C65 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Realme C65 5G and Vivo Y77 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y77 (China) leads Realme C65 5G by 10.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Realme C65 5G are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (66/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Realme C65 5G are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Realme C65 5G is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Realme C65 5G or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Vivo Y77 (China) edges out the Realme C65 5G by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme C65 5G and the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Realme C65 5G has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 45/100.
Should you choose the Realme C65 5G over the Vivo Y77 (China)?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Vivo Y77 (China) (66/100 vs 55/100).