Realme 16T vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
The Realme 16T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $200 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 35/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Realme 16T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 524,785); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme 16T doesn't.
Realme 16T
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper: $200 vs $1299
- Longer battery life (60/100 vs 51/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 32/100)
- Better value for money (96/100 vs 20/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 60W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (84/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 27/100)
Comparing the Realme 16T vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 40 points higher (75/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 27/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme 16T leads (96/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 16T (84/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 16T (86/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme 16T is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Realme 16T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (50/100 vs 32/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme 16T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (96/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Realme 16T | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | 3515964 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 3601 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 10686 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 25W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 157 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 8.9×None×None mm | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 214 g | |
| Price | $200 | $1299 |
Realme 16T
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Realme 16T
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme 16T
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
We compared Realme 16T and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Realme 16T by 85.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1099. Realme 16T is cheaper by $1099.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 16T (84/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 16T (86/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme 16T is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme 16T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (50/100 vs 32/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Realme 16T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (96/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Realme 16T or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 16T by 40 points (75/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Realme 16T and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Realme 16T has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme 16T or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 27/100).
Which is more powerful: the Realme 16T or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (84/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Realme 16T over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Realme 16T is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.