Poco X8 Pro Max vs Redmi Turbo 4
The Poco X8 Pro Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Redmi Turbo 4 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco X8 Pro Max leads — 71/100 vs 64/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Poco X8 Pro Max has the bigger battery (8500 mAh vs 6550); the Poco X8 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,629,444 vs 1,954,834); the Redmi Turbo 4 is noticeably lighter (203g vs 218g).
Poco X8 Pro Max
Redmi Turbo 4
- Higher AnTuTu: 2629444 vs 1954834
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1579
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 6100
- Bigger battery: 8500 vs 6550 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 83/100)
- Lighter: 203g vs 218g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 46/100)
Comparing the Poco X8 Pro Max vs the Redmi Turbo 4, the Poco X8 Pro Max scores 7 points higher (71/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco X8 Pro Max leads (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco X8 Pro Max is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Poco X8 Pro Max and the Redmi Turbo 4 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 37/100. In the "battery" category, the Poco X8 Pro Max is a bit better (77/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 4 is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100).
| Specification | Poco X8 Pro Max | Redmi Turbo 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 2629444 | 1954834 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3228 | 1579 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9553 | 6100 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1280 | 1220x2712 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8500 mAh | 6550 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.9×77.9×8.2 mm | 161.0×75.2×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 218 g | 203 g | |
| Launch price | $469 | — |
Poco X8 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Redmi Turbo 4
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Poco X8 Pro Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 4
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1220x2712
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco X8 Pro Max
- 8500 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Turbo 4
- 6550 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco X8 Pro Max and Redmi Turbo 4, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco X8 Pro Max leads Redmi Turbo 4 by 34.5% in our overall performance rating.
Redmi Turbo 4
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco X8 Pro Max is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco X8 Pro Max and the Redmi Turbo 4 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 37/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco X8 Pro Max is a bit better (77/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 4 is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100).
Which is better: the Poco X8 Pro Max or the Redmi Turbo 4?
The Poco X8 Pro Max edges out the Redmi Turbo 4 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco X8 Pro Max and the Redmi Turbo 4?
The Poco X8 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Redmi Turbo 4 — 64/100.
Which is more powerful: the Poco X8 Pro Max or the Redmi Turbo 4?
The Poco X8 Pro Max leads on performance (90/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Poco X8 Pro Max over the Redmi Turbo 4?
The Poco X8 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Redmi Turbo 4 is a better fit for active users.