Poco X4 NFC vs Redmi 13C 4G
The Poco X4 NFC (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920, while the Redmi 13C 4G (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco X4 NFC leads — 34/100 vs 25/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Poco X4 NFC has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco X4 NFC has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 13C 4G doesn't.
Poco X4 NFC
Redmi 13C 4G
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 67W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (41/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 41/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Poco X4 NFC vs the Redmi 13C 4G, the Poco X4 NFC scores 9 points higher (34/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco X4 NFC leads (41/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco X4 NFC leads (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 13C 4G leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Poco X4 NFC significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco X4 NFC notably outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (41/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco X4 NFC notably outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi 13C 4G is a bit better (50/100 vs 41/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 13C 4G significantly outperforms the Poco X4 NFC (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Poco X4 NFC | Redmi 13C 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 408000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1650 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 10W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 12, MIUI 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×76.2×8.3 mm | — | |
| Weight | 207 g | — | |
| Price | — | $130 |
Poco X4 NFC
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi 13C 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Poco X4 NFC
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi 13C 4G
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco X4 NFC
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Redmi 13C 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Poco X4 NFC
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco X4 NFC significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco X4 NFC notably outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (41/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco X4 NFC notably outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (51/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi 13C 4G is a bit better (50/100 vs 41/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 13C 4G significantly outperforms the Poco X4 NFC (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Poco X4 NFC or the Redmi 13C 4G?
The Poco X4 NFC edges out the Redmi 13C 4G by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco X4 NFC and the Redmi 13C 4G?
The Poco X4 NFC has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Redmi 13C 4G — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco X4 NFC or the Redmi 13C 4G?
The Poco X4 NFC leads on camera score (41/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Poco X4 NFC over the Redmi 13C 4G?
The Poco X4 NFC is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi 13C 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.