Poco X4 GT vs Redmi Note 11T Pro

The Poco X4 GT (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8100, while the Redmi Note 11T Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8100. Both devices score the same overall rating of 57/100. Key differences: the Redmi Note 11T Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,089,139 vs 1,080,106).

Both devices scored the same rating of 57/100 — the choice comes down to your priorities.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco X4 GT
Performance 61
Display 77
Camera 43
Battery 54
Portability 50
Value for money 52
Redmi Note 11T Pro
Performance 62
Display 77
Camera 43
Battery 54
Portability 50
Value for money
What makes Poco X4 GT better?

  • Overall rating 57/100
What makes Redmi Note 11T Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1089139 vs 1080106

  • Higher performance (62/100 vs 61/100)
Comparison verdict

The Poco X4 GT and the Redmi Note 11T Pro received the same MobileRank rating — 57/100. In the "performance" category, the Redmi Note 11T Pro and the Poco X4 GT are nearly equal (62/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 77/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100. In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.

Poco X4 GT: The Poco X4 GT is a better fit for active users.
Redmi Note 11T Pro: The Redmi Note 11T Pro is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco X4 GT Redmi Note 11T Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8100 MediaTek Dimensity 8100
AnTuTu 1080106 1089139
Geekbench Single 1139 1139
Geekbench Multi 3842 3842
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 2460x1080 1080x2460
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5080 mAh 5080 mAh
Charging 67W 67W
Main camera 64 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Front camera 16 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 12 Android 12, MIUI 13
Brightness (peak) 650 nits 650 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP53 IP53
Dimensions 163.6×74.3×8.9 mm 163.6×74.3×8.9 mm
Weight 200 g 200 g
Launch price $380
Camera comparison
Poco X4 GT
  • Main: 64MP f/1.89
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
43
camera
Redmi Note 11T Pro
  • Main: 64MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
43
camera
Display comparison
Poco X4 GT
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 2460x1080
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
77
display
Redmi Note 11T Pro
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2460
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
77
display
Battery and charging
Poco X4 GT
  • 5080 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • No wireless charging
54
battery
Redmi Note 11T Pro
  • 5080 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • No wireless charging
54
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Poco X4 GT and Redmi Note 11T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco X4 GT MediaTek Dimensity 8100
57/100
1080106 AnTuTu
Redmi Note 11T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8100
57/100 +0.8%
1089139 AnTuTu

Redmi Note 11T Pro leads Poco X4 GT by 0.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco X4 GT
$380
Redmi Note 11T Pro
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi Note 11T Pro and the Poco X4 GT are nearly equal (62/100 vs 61/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 77/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100.

portability

In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco X4 GT or the Redmi Note 11T Pro?

Both devices scored 57/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Redmi Note 11T Pro.

What is the rating of the Poco X4 GT and the Redmi Note 11T Pro?

The Poco X4 GT has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Redmi Note 11T Pro — 57/100.

Should you choose the Poco X4 GT over the Redmi Note 11T Pro?

The Poco X4 GT is a better fit for active users. The Redmi Note 11T Pro is a better fit for active users.