Poco X3 vs Redmi Note 10 Pro (India)
The Poco X3 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, while the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) leads — 49/100 vs 47/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Poco X3 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5020); the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) is noticeably lighter (192g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco X3
Redmi Note 10 Pro (India)
What makes Poco X3 better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5020 mAh
- Better camera (46/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (53/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 225g
- Better display (79/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (63/100 vs 28/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco X3 vs the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India), the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) scores 2 points higher (49/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 42/100. In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco X3 and the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco X3 is a bit better (53/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) significantly outperforms the Poco X3 (63/100 vs 28/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco X3 | Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G | |
| AnTuTu | 531656 | 531656 | |
| Geekbench Single | 752 | 752 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1819 | 1819 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5020 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 12 | Android 11, MIUI 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 450 nits | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP53 | — | |
| Dimensions | 165.3×76.8×10.1 mm | 164.5×76.2×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 225 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Poco X3
- Main: 64MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 20MP
Redmi Note 10 Pro (India)
- Main: 64MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Poco X3
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 10 Pro (India)
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco X3
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Note 10 Pro (India)
- 5020 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Poco X3 and Redmi Note 10 Pro (India), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 42/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco X3 and the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco X3 is a bit better (53/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) significantly outperforms the Poco X3 (63/100 vs 28/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco X3 or the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India)?
The Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) edges out the Poco X3 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco X3 and the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India)?
The Poco X3 has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) — 49/100.
Should you choose the Poco X3 over the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India)?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) (63/100 vs 28/100).