Poco M8 Power vs Redmi Turbo 5 Max
The Poco M8 Power (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4, while the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads — 71/100 vs 50/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 8000); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,728,128 vs 600,942).
Poco M8 Power
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Overall rating 50/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 2728128 vs 600942
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 930
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 2210
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 8000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher performance (88/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
Comparing the Poco M8 Power vs the Redmi Turbo 5 Max, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max scores 21 points higher (71/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (88/100 vs 47/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Poco M8 Power (88/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Poco M8 Power (80/100 vs 64/100).
| Specification | Poco M8 Power | Redmi Turbo 5 Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 600942 | 2728128 | |
| Geekbench Single | 930 | 2680 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2210 | 8358 | |
| Display | 7.0" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2396 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 9000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 219 g | |
| Launch price | — | $300 |
Poco M8 Power
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Poco M8 Power
- 7.0" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2396
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco M8 Power
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco M8 Power and Redmi Turbo 5 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads Poco M8 Power by 78.0% in our overall performance rating.
Poco M8 Power
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Poco M8 Power (88/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Poco M8 Power (80/100 vs 64/100).
Which is better: the Poco M8 Power or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Poco M8 Power by 21 points (71/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Poco M8 Power and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Poco M8 Power has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco M8 Power or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on camera score (37/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco M8 Power or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on performance (88/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Poco M8 Power over the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Poco M8 Power is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.