Poco M7 vs ZTE Axon 40
The Poco M7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 58/100 vs 43/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Poco M7 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 467,392); the ZTE Axon 40 has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco M7 doesn't; the ZTE Axon 40 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 224g).
Poco M7
ZTE Axon 40
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (74/100 vs 73/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 467392
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 466
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 1396
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 200g vs 224g
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 33/100)
- Better camera (51/100 vs 30/100)
- Better portability (53/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Poco M7 vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 15 points higher (58/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (61/100 vs 33/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (51/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Poco M7 (61/100 vs 33/100). In the "display" category, the Poco M7 and the ZTE Axon 40 are nearly equal (74/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Poco M7 (51/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco M7 is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Poco M7 | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 467392 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 224 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | $110 | — |
Poco M7
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Poco M7
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco M7
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco M7 and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 leads Poco M7 by 53.7% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Poco M7 (61/100 vs 33/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco M7 and the ZTE Axon 40 are nearly equal (74/100 vs 73/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Poco M7 (51/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco M7 is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Poco M7 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 is noticeably better than the Poco M7 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Poco M7 and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Poco M7 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco M7 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco M7 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on performance (61/100 vs 33/100).
Should you choose the Poco M7 over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Poco M7 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.