Poco M7 Plus 5G vs ZTE V40 Pro
The Poco M7 Plus 5G (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, while the ZTE V40 Pro (2022) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco M7 Plus 5G leads — 36/100 vs 22/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Poco M7 Plus 5G has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 108 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE V40 Pro is noticeably lighter (190g vs 217g).
Poco M7 Plus 5G
ZTE V40 Pro
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5100 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Longer battery life (53/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (98/100 vs 55/100)
- Faster charging: 65W vs 33W
- Lighter: 190g vs 217g
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 28/100)
Comparing the Poco M7 Plus 5G vs the ZTE V40 Pro, the Poco M7 Plus 5G scores 14 points higher (36/100 vs 22/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G leads (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 37/100. In the "battery" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G and the ZTE V40 Pro are nearly equal (53/100 vs 50/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE V40 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Plus 5G (62/100 vs 28/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (98/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Poco M7 Plus 5G | ZTE V40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 | Unisoc Tiger T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 622608 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 938 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2183 | — | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 | |
| NFC | — | no | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.9×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 217 g | 190 g | |
| Price | $168 | — |
Poco M7 Plus 5G
- Main: 108MP f/1.75
- Front: 13MP
ZTE V40 Pro
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco M7 Plus 5G
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2460x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE V40 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Poco M7 Plus 5G
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 37/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G and the ZTE V40 Pro are nearly equal (53/100 vs 50/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE V40 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Plus 5G (62/100 vs 28/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco M7 Plus 5G significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (98/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Poco M7 Plus 5G or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Poco M7 Plus 5G is noticeably better than the ZTE V40 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Poco M7 Plus 5G and the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Poco M7 Plus 5G has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the ZTE V40 Pro — 22/100.
Should you choose the Poco M7 Plus 5G over the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Poco M7 Plus 5G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE V40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.