Poco M6 Plus vs Tecno Phantom V Fold2
The Poco M6 Plus (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 AE, while the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leads — 73/100 vs 49/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 has the bigger battery (5750 mAh vs 5030); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco M6 Plus doesn't; the Poco M6 Plus is noticeably lighter (205g vs 249g).
Poco M6 Plus
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 205g vs 249g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 52/100)
- Bigger battery: 5750 vs 5030 mAh
- Faster charging: 70W vs 33W
- Better camera (78/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 47/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Poco M6 Plus vs the Tecno Phantom V Fold2, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 scores 24 points higher (73/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leads (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leads (68/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 significantly outperforms the Poco M6 Plus (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 notably outperforms the Poco M6 Plus (68/100 vs 47/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco M6 Plus and the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Poco M6 Plus | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 AE | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1453683 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1967 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 5401 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 2000x2296 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5030 mAh | 5750 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 70W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HiOS 14 Fold | |
| Brightness (peak) | 550 nits | 1600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP53 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 168.6×76.3×8.3 mm | 159.0×140.4×6.1 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 249 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Poco M6 Plus
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Poco M6 Plus
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2000x2296
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco M6 Plus
- 5030 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- 5750 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- Wireless: 15W
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 significantly outperforms the Poco M6 Plus (78/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 notably outperforms the Poco M6 Plus (68/100 vs 47/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco M6 Plus and the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Poco M6 Plus or the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 significantly outperforms the Poco M6 Plus by 24 points (73/100 vs 49/100).
What is the rating of the Poco M6 Plus and the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Poco M6 Plus has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco M6 Plus or the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Poco M6 Plus over the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Poco M6 Plus is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a better fit for active users.