Poco F8 Ultra vs Tecno Pova Curve

The Poco F8 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Pova Curve (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate; launch prices were $729 and $219. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F8 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 58/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Poco F8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,640,351 vs 877,641); the Tecno Pova Curve is noticeably lighter (189g vs 218g).

The Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve by 31 points (89/100 vs 58/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F8 Ultra
Performance 97
Display 90
Camera 90
Battery 85
Portability 49
Value for money 90
Tecno Pova Curve
Performance 55
Display 89
Camera 39
Battery 64
Portability 70
Value for money 76
What makes Poco F8 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3640351 vs 877641
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2813
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (90/100 vs 39/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
What makes Tecno Pova Curve better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 189g vs 218g
  • Cheaper at launch: $219 vs $729

  • Better portability (70/100 vs 49/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco F8 Ultra vs the Tecno Pova Curve, the Poco F8 Ultra scores 31 points higher (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Poco F8 Ultra — 90/100, Tecno Pova Curve — 76/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Curve are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (90/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Poco F8 Ultra (70/100 vs 49/100).

Poco F8 Ultra: The Poco F8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Tecno Pova Curve: The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco F8 Ultra Tecno Pova Curve
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Dimensity 7300 Ultimate
AnTuTu 3640351 877641
Geekbench Single 3640 1011
Geekbench Multi 11033 2813
Display 6.7" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 3200x1440 1080x2436
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 5500 mAh
Charging 100W 45W
Wireless charging 50W
Main camera 200 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 13 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits 1300 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP64
Dimensions 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm
Weight 218 g 189 g
Launch price $729 $219
Camera comparison
Poco F8 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
90
camera
Tecno Pova Curve
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
39
camera
Display comparison
Poco F8 Ultra
  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display
Tecno Pova Curve
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2436
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Poco F8 Ultra
  • 6500 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 15:14 hrs, total 32:38 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
85
battery
Tecno Pova Curve
  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless charging: no data
64
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Poco F8 Ultra and Tecno Pova Curve, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100
3640351 AnTuTu
Tecno Pova Curve Dimensity 7300 Ultimate
58/100 -314.8%
877641 AnTuTu

Poco F8 Ultra leads Tecno Pova Curve by 314.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco F8 Ultra
$729
Tecno Pova Curve
$219

Launch price difference: $510. Tecno Pova Curve was $510 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (97/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Curve are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (90/100 vs 39/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (85/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Poco F8 Ultra (70/100 vs 49/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F8 Ultra or the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve by 31 points (89/100 vs 58/100).

What is the rating of the Poco F8 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Poco F8 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Tecno Pova Curve — 58/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco F8 Ultra or the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Poco F8 Ultra leads on camera score (90/100 vs 39/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco F8 Ultra or the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Poco F8 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Poco F8 Ultra over the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Poco F8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.