Poco F8 Ultra vs TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra

The Poco F8 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400; launch prices were $729 and $329. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F8 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 57/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco F8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,651,476 vs 953,150).

The Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra by 32 points (89/100 vs 57/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Poco F8 Ultra

Performance 97
Display 90
Camera 90
Battery 85
Portability 49
Value for money 92

TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra

Performance 57
Display 63
Camera 61
Battery 50
Portability 47
Value for money 50

What makes Poco F8 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3651476 vs 953150
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3185
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 218g vs 227g

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better camera (90/100 vs 61/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (90/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better portability (49/100 vs 47/100)

What makes TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $329 vs $729

  • Overall rating 57/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco F8 Ultra vs the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra, the Poco F8 Ultra scores 32 points higher (89/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Poco F8 Ultra — 92/100, TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (97/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (90/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (90/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (85/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F8 Ultra and the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra are nearly equal (49/100 vs 47/100).

Poco F8 Ultra: The Poco F8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Poco F8 Ultra TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 7400
AnTuTu 3651476 953150
Geekbench Single 3639 1061
Geekbench Multi 11047 3185
Display 6.7" LTPO AMOLED 7.2" IPS LCD
Resolution 3200x1440 1080x2340
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 5200 mAh
Charging 100W 33W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits 850 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm 174.5×81.2×7.6 mm
Weight 218 g 227 g
Launch price $729 $329

Camera comparison

Poco F8 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
90
camera

TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera

Display comparison

Poco F8 Ultra

  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display

TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra

  • 7.2" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
63
display

Battery and charging

Poco F8 Ultra

  • 6500 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 15:14 hrs, total 32:38 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
85
battery

TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
50
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Poco F8 Ultra and TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100
3651476 AnTuTu
TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400
57/100 -283.1%
953150 AnTuTu

Poco F8 Ultra leads TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra by 283.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Poco F8 Ultra

$729

TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra

$329

Launch price difference: $400. TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra was $400 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (97/100 vs 57/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (90/100 vs 63/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (90/100 vs 61/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (85/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Poco F8 Ultra and the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra are nearly equal (49/100 vs 47/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Poco F8 Ultra or the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?

The Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra by 32 points (89/100 vs 57/100).

What is the rating of the Poco F8 Ultra and the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?

The Poco F8 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra — 57/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco F8 Ultra or the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?

The Poco F8 Ultra leads on camera score (90/100 vs 61/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco F8 Ultra or the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?

The Poco F8 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Poco F8 Ultra over the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?

The Poco F8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.