Poco F8 Pro vs Xiaomi 15S Pro
The Poco F8 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi 15S Pro (2025) runs on the Xiaomi XRING O1; estimated prices are $529 and $760. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 15S Pro leads — 84/100 vs 79/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 Pro has the bigger battery (6210 mAh vs 6100); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco F8 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,033,306 vs 2,998,904).
Poco F8 Pro
Xiaomi 15S Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 3033306 vs 2998904
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 8431
- Bigger battery: 6210 vs 6100 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper: $529 vs $760
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 89/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 83/100)
Comparing the Poco F8 Pro vs the Xiaomi 15S Pro, the Xiaomi 15S Pro scores 5 points higher (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Pro and the Xiaomi 15S Pro are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro is a bit better (78/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro is a bit better (77/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100.
| Specification | Poco F8 Pro | Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Xiaomi XRING O1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3033306 | 2998904 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 2746 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 8431 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6210 mAh | 6100 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.3×8.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Price | $529 | $760 |
Poco F8 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.65
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Xiaomi 15S Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Poco F8 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 15S Pro
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F8 Pro
- 6210 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:55 hrs, total 30:03 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 15S Pro
- 6100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Poco F8 Pro and Xiaomi 15S Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F8 Pro leads Xiaomi 15S Pro by 1.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $231. Poco F8 Pro is cheaper by $231.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Pro and the Xiaomi 15S Pro are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro is a bit better (78/100 vs 70/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro is a bit better (77/100 vs 68/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100.
Which is better: the Poco F8 Pro or the Xiaomi 15S Pro?
The Xiaomi 15S Pro edges out the Poco F8 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco F8 Pro and the Xiaomi 15S Pro?
The Poco F8 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Xiaomi 15S Pro — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F8 Pro or the Xiaomi 15S Pro?
The Xiaomi 15S Pro leads on camera score (78/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Poco F8 Pro over the Xiaomi 15S Pro?
The Poco F8 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 15S Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.