Poco F7 vs ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
The Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads — 67/100 vs 66/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the Poco F7 is faster in AnTuTu (2,205,289 vs 1,754,213).
Poco F7
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 2205289 vs 1754213
- Better Geekbench Single: 2070 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6694 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (81/100 vs 75/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 63/100)
- Better portability (48/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 83/100)
Comparing the Poco F7 vs the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra scores 1 points higher (67/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (81/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 (57/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (48/100 vs 30/100).
| Specification | Poco F7 | ZTE Axon 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 2205289 | 1754213 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2070 | 2004 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6694 | 5311 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm | 163.6×76.0×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | — | |
| Price | $399 | — |
Poco F7
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Poco F7
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco F7 and ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 leads ZTE Axon 60 Ultra by 25.7% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (81/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 (57/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (48/100 vs 30/100).
Which is better: the Poco F7 or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra edges out the Poco F7 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco F7 and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Poco F7 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — 67/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F7 or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F7 or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Poco F7 leads on performance (81/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Poco F7 over the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a better fit for active users.