Poco F7 vs Realme GT7 Pro Racing
The Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Realme GT7 Pro Racing (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing leads — 70/100 vs 66/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Realme GT7 Pro Racing is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 2,205,289).
Poco F7
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
- Lighter: 215g vs 218g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (48/100 vs 42/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 2205289
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2070
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 6694
- Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 83/100)
Comparing the Poco F7 vs the Realme GT7 Pro Racing, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing scores 4 points higher (70/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing leads (92/100 vs 81/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing is a bit better (92/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 and the Realme GT7 Pro Racing are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (48/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Poco F7 | Realme GT7 Pro Racing | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2205289 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2070 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6694 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 1264x2780 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm | 162.5×76.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 218 g | |
| Price | $399 | — |
Poco F7
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco F7
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco F7 and Realme GT7 Pro Racing, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Realme GT7 Pro Racing leads Poco F7 by 29.3% in our overall performance rating.
Realme GT7 Pro Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing is a bit better (92/100 vs 81/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 and the Realme GT7 Pro Racing are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (48/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Poco F7 or the Realme GT7 Pro Racing?
The Realme GT7 Pro Racing edges out the Poco F7 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco F7 and the Realme GT7 Pro Racing?
The Poco F7 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Realme GT7 Pro Racing — 70/100.
Which is more powerful: the Poco F7 or the Realme GT7 Pro Racing?
The Realme GT7 Pro Racing leads on performance (92/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Poco F7 over the Realme GT7 Pro Racing?
The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Realme GT7 Pro Racing is a better fit for gamers and power users.