Poco F7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M17e
The Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy M17e (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300; launch prices were $499 and $140. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Pro leads — 80/100 vs 43/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (2,180,606 vs 524,785); the Poco F7 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M17e doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy M17e is noticeably lighter (199g vs 220g).
Poco F7 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- Higher AnTuTu: 2180606 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
- Higher performance (87/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (67/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 55/100)
- Lighter: 199g vs 220g
- Cheaper at launch: $140 vs $499
- Better portability (57/100 vs 46/100)
Comparing the Poco F7 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy M17e, the Poco F7 Pro scores 37 points higher (80/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (67/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Poco F7 Pro — 86/100, Samsung Galaxy M17e — 64/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (87/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (67/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (87/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e is a bit better (57/100 vs 46/100).
| Specification | Poco F7 Pro | Samsung Galaxy M17e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 2180606 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" PLS LCD | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 32 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm | 167.4×77.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 220 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $499 | $140 |
Poco F7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Poco F7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco F7 Pro and Samsung Galaxy M17e, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy M17e by 315.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $359. Samsung Galaxy M17e was $359 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (87/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (90/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (67/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (87/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e is a bit better (57/100 vs 46/100).
Which is better: the Poco F7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e by 37 points (80/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F7 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Poco F7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17e — 43/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Poco F7 Pro leads on camera score (67/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Poco F7 Pro leads on performance (87/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Poco F7 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy M17e is a better fit for everyday use.