Poco F7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A03 Core

The Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (2022) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A; launch prices were $499 and $100. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Pro leads — 80/100 vs 24/100 (a 56-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 8 MP; the Poco F7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (2,300,523 vs 153,667); the Poco F7 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is noticeably lighter (196g vs 220g).

The Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 56 points (80/100 vs 24/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F7 Pro
Performance 88
Display 90
Camera 67
Battery 87
Portability 46
Value for money 86
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
Performance 9
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 66
Portability 50
Value for money 32
What makes Poco F7 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2300523 vs 153667
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 846
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (88/100 vs 9/100)
  • Better camera (67/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (87/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better display (90/100 vs 32/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A03 Core better?
  • Lighter: 196g vs 220g
  • Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $499

  • Better portability (50/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco F7 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, the Poco F7 Pro scores 56 points higher (80/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (88/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (67/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 66/100). Value score: Poco F7 Pro — 86/100, Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 32/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (88/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (90/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (67/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (87/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core and the Poco F7 Pro are nearly equal (50/100 vs 46/100).

Poco F7 Pro: The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core: The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco F7 Pro Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Unisoc SC9863A
AnTuTu 2300523 153667
Geekbench Single 3041 205
Geekbench Multi 9494 846
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.5" IPS LCD
Resolution 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 120W
Wireless charging 50W
Main camera 50 MP 8 MP
Ultrawide 32 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 20 MP 5 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 2GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 32GB
OS Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP68
Dimensions 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm
Weight 220 g 196 g
Launch price $499 $100
Camera comparison
Poco F7 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 32MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
67
camera
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • Main: 8MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera
Display comparison
Poco F7 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display
Battery and charging
Poco F7 Pro
  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
87
battery
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
66
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Poco F7 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco F7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
80/100
2300523 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core Unisoc SC9863A
24/100 -1397.1%
153667 AnTuTu

Poco F7 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 1397.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco F7 Pro
$499
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
$100

Launch price difference: $399. Samsung Galaxy A03 Core was $399 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (88/100 vs 9/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (90/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (67/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (87/100 vs 66/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core and the Poco F7 Pro are nearly equal (50/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 56 points (80/100 vs 24/100).

What is the rating of the Poco F7 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Poco F7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 24/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco F7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Poco F7 Pro leads on camera score (67/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco F7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Poco F7 Pro leads on performance (88/100 vs 9/100).

Should you choose the Poco F7 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for everyday use.