Poco F7 Pro vs Redmi K80 Pro
The Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Redmi K80 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $499 and $511. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K80 Pro leads — 71/100 vs 66/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K80 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,014,660 vs 2,180,606).
Poco F7 Pro
Redmi K80 Pro
- Cheaper: $499 vs $511
- Overall rating 66/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3014660 vs 2180606
- Lighter: 215g vs 220g
- Higher performance (68/100 vs 57/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (31/100 vs 25/100)
Comparing the Poco F7 Pro vs the Redmi K80 Pro, the Redmi K80 Pro scores 5 points higher (71/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (68/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 63/100. In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "design" category, the Redmi K80 Pro is a bit better (31/100 vs 25/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 75/100.
| Specification | Poco F7 Pro | Redmi K80 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2180606 | 3014660 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm | 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 220 g | 215 g | |
| Price | $499 | $511 |
Poco F7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Redmi K80 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Poco F7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K80 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Redmi K80 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Poco F7 Pro and Redmi K80 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi K80 Pro leads Poco F7 Pro by 27.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $12. Poco F7 Pro is cheaper by $12.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 63/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi K80 Pro is a bit better (31/100 vs 25/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 75/100.
Which is better: the Poco F7 Pro or the Redmi K80 Pro?
The Redmi K80 Pro edges out the Poco F7 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco F7 Pro and the Redmi K80 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Redmi K80 Pro — 71/100.
Which is more powerful: the Poco F7 Pro or the Redmi K80 Pro?
The Redmi K80 Pro leads on performance (68/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Poco F7 Pro over the Redmi K80 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi K80 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.