Poco F6 vs Tecno Phantom X2
The Poco F6 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Tecno Phantom X2 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F6 leads — 63/100 vs 62/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Phantom X2 has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Poco F6 is faster in AnTuTu (1,718,632 vs 1,484,077); the Poco F6 is noticeably lighter (179g vs 203g).
Poco F6
Tecno Phantom X2
- Higher AnTuTu: 1718632 vs 1484077
- Better Geekbench Single: 1930 vs 1693
- Better Geekbench Multi: 5017 vs 4384
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Lighter: 179g vs 203g
- Higher performance (74/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (72/100 vs 48/100)
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (50/100 vs 37/100)
Comparing the Poco F6 vs the Tecno Phantom X2, the Poco F6 scores 1 points higher (63/100 vs 62/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom X2 leads (50/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F6 and the Tecno Phantom X2 are nearly equal (74/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F6 and the Tecno Phantom X2 are nearly equal (83/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom X2 is a bit better (50/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F6 is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F6 notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom X2 (72/100 vs 48/100).
| Specification | Poco F6 | Tecno Phantom X2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | |
| AnTuTu | 1718632 | 1484077 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1930 | 1693 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5017 | 4384 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5160 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14 / HyperOS | Android 12, HIOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.5×74.5×8.0 mm | 164.6×72.7×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 203 g | |
| Launch price | $290 | — |
Poco F6
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Tecno Phantom X2
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Poco F6
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Phantom X2
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F6
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Phantom X2
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco F6 and Tecno Phantom X2, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F6 leads Tecno Phantom X2 by 15.8% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Phantom X2
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F6 and the Tecno Phantom X2 are nearly equal (74/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F6 and the Tecno Phantom X2 are nearly equal (83/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom X2 is a bit better (50/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F6 is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F6 notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom X2 (72/100 vs 48/100).
Which is better: the Poco F6 or the Tecno Phantom X2?
The Poco F6 edges out the Tecno Phantom X2 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco F6 and the Tecno Phantom X2?
The Poco F6 has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Tecno Phantom X2 — 62/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F6 or the Tecno Phantom X2?
The Tecno Phantom X2 leads on camera score (50/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Poco F6 over the Tecno Phantom X2?
The Poco F6 is a better fit for active users. The Tecno Phantom X2 is a better fit for active users.