Poco F5 vs Redmi Note 12 Turbo

The Poco F5 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, while the Redmi Note 12 Turbo (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. Both devices score the same overall rating of 61/100. Key differences: the Redmi Note 12 Turbo is faster in AnTuTu (1,333,299 vs 1,263,761).

Both devices scored the same rating of 61/100 — the choice comes down to your priorities.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F5
Performance 68
Display 79
Camera 43
Battery 53
Portability 71
Value for money 64
Redmi Note 12 Turbo
Performance 69
Display 79
Camera 43
Battery 53
Portability 71
Value for money
What makes Poco F5 better?

  • Overall rating 61/100
What makes Redmi Note 12 Turbo better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1333299 vs 1263761

  • Higher performance (69/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict

The Poco F5 and the Redmi Note 12 Turbo received the same MobileRank rating — 61/100. In the "performance" category, the Redmi Note 12 Turbo and the Poco F5 are nearly equal (69/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 53/100. In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 71/100.

Poco F5: The Poco F5 is a better fit for active users.
Redmi Note 12 Turbo: The Redmi Note 12 Turbo is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco F5 Redmi Note 12 Turbo
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
AnTuTu 1263761 1333299
Geekbench Single 1653 1653
Geekbench Multi 4349 4349
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.7" OLED
Resolution 2400x1080 1080x2400
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 67W 67W
Main camera 64 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Front camera 16 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 8GB / 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13 Android 13, MIUI 14
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits 1000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP53
Dimensions 161.1×74.9×7.9 mm 161.1×75.0×7.9 mm
Weight 181 g 181 g
Launch price $330
Camera comparison
Poco F5
  • Main: 64MP f/1.79
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
43
camera
Redmi Note 12 Turbo
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
43
camera
Display comparison
Poco F5
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Redmi Note 12 Turbo
  • 6.7" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Battery and charging
Poco F5
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery
Redmi Note 12 Turbo
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Poco F5 and Redmi Note 12 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
61/100
1263761 AnTuTu
Redmi Note 12 Turbo Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
61/100 +5.2%
1333299 AnTuTu

Redmi Note 12 Turbo leads Poco F5 by 5.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco F5
$330
Redmi Note 12 Turbo
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi Note 12 Turbo and the Poco F5 are nearly equal (69/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 53/100.

portability

In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 71/100.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F5 or the Redmi Note 12 Turbo?

Both devices scored 61/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Redmi Note 12 Turbo.

What is the rating of the Poco F5 and the Redmi Note 12 Turbo?

The Poco F5 has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Redmi Note 12 Turbo — 61/100.

Should you choose the Poco F5 over the Redmi Note 12 Turbo?

The Poco F5 is a better fit for active users. The Redmi Note 12 Turbo is a better fit for active users.