Poco C75 vs Redmi 7A
The Poco C75 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the Redmi 7A (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 439; estimated prices are $116 and $90. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco C75 leads — 32/100 vs 11/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C75 has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Poco C75 is faster in AnTuTu (358,383 vs 193,115); the Poco C75 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 7A doesn't; the Redmi 7A is noticeably lighter (165g vs 204g).
Poco C75
Redmi 7A
- Higher AnTuTu: 358383 vs 193115
- Better Geekbench Single: 432 vs 199
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1416 vs 795
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Better camera (26/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (40/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 165g vs 204g
- Cheaper: $90 vs $116
- Better design/ergonomics (93/100 vs 45/100)
Comparing the Poco C75 vs the Redmi 7A, the Poco C75 scores 21 points higher (32/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C75 leads (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C75 leads (40/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the Redmi 7A (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C75 notably outperforms the Redmi 7A (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C75 notably outperforms the Redmi 7A (40/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi 7A significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (93/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Poco C75 | Redmi 7A | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 | |
| AnTuTu | 358383 | 193115 | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | 199 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | 795 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 5.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 2GB / 3GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 16GB / 32GB | |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | 146.3×70.4×9.6 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 165 g | |
| Price | $116 | $90 |
Poco C75
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Redmi 7A
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Poco C75
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi 7A
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Poco C75
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Redmi 7A
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco C75 and Redmi 7A, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco C75 leads Redmi 7A by 85.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $26. Redmi 7A is cheaper by $26.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the Redmi 7A (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco C75 notably outperforms the Redmi 7A (26/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C75 notably outperforms the Redmi 7A (40/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi 7A significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (93/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Poco C75 or the Redmi 7A?
The Poco C75 significantly outperforms the Redmi 7A by 21 points (32/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C75 and the Redmi 7A?
The Poco C75 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Redmi 7A — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C75 or the Redmi 7A?
The Poco C75 leads on camera score (26/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Poco C75 over the Redmi 7A?
The Poco C75 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi 7A is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.