Poco C75 5G vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Poco C75 5G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 42/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5160); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 506,757); the Vivo iQOO 16 has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco C75 5G doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C75 5G
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Poco C75 5G better?
- Lighter: 212g vs 223g
- Better portability (50/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 506757
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 838
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 1899
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5160 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C75 5G vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 47 points higher (89/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (100/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (90/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C75 5G is a bit better (50/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C75 5G | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 506757 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 838 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1899 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 212 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Poco C75 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco C75 5G
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C75 5G
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C75 5G and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Poco C75 5G by 90.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco C75 5G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (100/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (99/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (78/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (90/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C75 5G is a bit better (50/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C75 5G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G by 47 points (89/100 vs 42/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C75 5G and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Poco C75 5G has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C75 5G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C75 5G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Poco C75 5G over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.