Poco C61 vs Vivo X500
The Poco C61 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G36, while the Vivo X500 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600M. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 leads — 89/100 vs 27/100 (a 62-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X500 is faster in AnTuTu (3,930,719 vs 193,858); the Vivo X500 has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco C61 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C61
Vivo X500
What makes Poco C61 better?
- Lighter: 199g vs 211g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Vivo X500 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3930719 vs 193858
- Better Geekbench Single: 3302 vs 189
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10240 vs 781
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 10W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 11/100)
- Longer battery life (84/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C61 vs the Vivo X500, the Vivo X500 scores 62 points higher (89/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 leads (96/100 vs 11/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 leads (84/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (96/100 vs 11/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (94/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (84/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C61 is a bit better (56/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C61 | Vivo X500 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G36 | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M | |
| AnTuTu | 193858 | 3930719 | |
| Geekbench Single | 189 | 3302 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 781 | 10240 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 1260x2750 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB / 6GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, MIUI | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | 4000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 168.4×76.3×8.3 mm | 157.0×75.0×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 211 g | |
| Launch price | — | $820 |
Camera comparison
Poco C61
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X500
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Poco C61
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X500
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2750
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C61
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X500
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C61 and Vivo X500, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X500 leads Poco C61 by 95.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco C61
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (96/100 vs 11/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (94/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (84/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C61 is a bit better (56/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C61 or the Vivo X500?
The Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 by 62 points (89/100 vs 27/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C61 and the Vivo X500?
The Poco C61 has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo X500 — 89/100.
Which is more powerful: the Poco C61 or the Vivo X500?
The Vivo X500 leads on performance (96/100 vs 11/100).
Should you choose the Poco C61 over the Vivo X500?
The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.