Poco C55 vs Vivo X300s
The Poco C55 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 35/100 (a 54-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 348,562); the Poco C55 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 217g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C55
Vivo X300s
What makes Poco C55 better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 217g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 348562
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 419
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1461
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 10W
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C55 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 54 points higher (89/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (95/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (95/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (94/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (83/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C55 is a bit better (56/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C55 | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 348562 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 419 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1461 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| NFC | no | — | |
| Dimensions | 168.8×76.4×8.8 mm | — | |
| Weight | 192 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | — | $723 |
Camera comparison
Poco C55
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Poco C55
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C55
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C55 and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Poco C55 by 90.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco C55
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (95/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (94/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (83/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C55 is a bit better (56/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C55 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Poco C55 by 54 points (89/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C55 and the Vivo X300s?
The Poco C55 has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which is more powerful: the Poco C55 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (95/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Poco C55 over the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.