Poco C55 vs Redmi Turbo 5 Max
The Poco C55 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads — 70/100 vs 35/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,708,482 vs 346,495); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco C55 doesn't; the Poco C55 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 219g).
Poco C55
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Lighter: 192g vs 219g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 45/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2708482 vs 346495
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 420
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 1364
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 10W
- Higher performance (87/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Poco C55 vs the Redmi Turbo 5 Max, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max scores 35 points higher (70/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (87/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (87/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (80/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C55 is a bit better (56/100 vs 45/100).
| Specification | Poco C55 | Redmi Turbo 5 Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 346495 | 2708482 | |
| Geekbench Single | 420 | 2680 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1364 | 8358 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 9000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 100W | |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 168.8×76.4×8.8 mm | 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | — | $300 |
Poco C55
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Poco C55
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C55
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco C55 and Redmi Turbo 5 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads Poco C55 by 87.2% in our overall performance rating.
Poco C55
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (87/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (84/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (80/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C55 is a bit better (56/100 vs 45/100).
Which is better: the Poco C55 or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Poco C55 by 35 points (70/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C55 and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Poco C55 has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 70/100.
Which is more powerful: the Poco C55 or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on performance (87/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Poco C55 over the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Poco C55 is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.