Oscal Flat 3C Mini vs Vivo X500 Pro
The Oscal Flat 3C Mini (2026) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 16/100 (a 74-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 5 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 153,667); the Vivo X500 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini doesn't; the Oscal Flat 3C Mini is noticeably lighter (158g vs 192g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
Vivo X500 Pro
What makes Oscal Flat 3C Mini better?
- Lighter: 158g vs 192g
- Better portability (68/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 153667
- Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 846
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 5MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 9/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 31/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oscal Flat 3C Mini vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 74 points higher (90/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (100/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (100/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (94/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (81/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oscal Flat 3C Mini | Vivo X500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9863A | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | 5016623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | 4188 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | 13145 | |
| Display | 5.0" IPS LCD | 6.4" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 480x854 | 1216x2660 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 Go | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 135.6×70.2×11.1 mm | 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 158 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | $970 |
Camera comparison
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Vivo X500 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 480x854
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2660
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Oscal Flat 3C Mini and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X500 Pro leads Oscal Flat 3C Mini by 96.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (100/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (94/100 vs 31/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (87/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (81/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oscal Flat 3C Mini or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini by 74 points (90/100 vs 16/100).
What is the rating of the Oscal Flat 3C Mini and the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Oscal Flat 3C Mini has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oscal Flat 3C Mini or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oscal Flat 3C Mini or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Oscal Flat 3C Mini over the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.