Oppo Reno7 A vs Poco F7
The Oppo Reno7 A (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (), while the Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 leads — 51/100 vs 23/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Oppo Reno7 A is noticeably lighter (175g vs 215g).
Oppo Reno7 A
Poco F7
- Lighter: 175g vs 215g
- Better design/ergonomics (81/100 vs 31/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4500 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (40/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (32/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (65/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (82/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno7 A vs the Poco F7, the Poco F7 scores 28 points higher (51/100 vs 23/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 leads (40/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 leads (65/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 leads (82/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 A (40/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 A (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 and the Oppo Reno7 A are nearly equal (32/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 A (65/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno7 A significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (81/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Oppo Reno7 A (82/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno7 A | Poco F7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 () | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2205289 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 2070 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 6694 | |
| Display | 6.4" Amoled | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | — | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 Snow Cone | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX4 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.7×73.4×7.6 mm | 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 175 g | 215 g | |
| Price | — | $399 |
Oppo Reno7 A
- Main: 48MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco F7
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Oppo Reno7 A
- 6.4" Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco F7
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno7 A
- 4500 mAh
- No wireless charging
Poco F7
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno7 A
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 A (40/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 A (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 and the Oppo Reno7 A are nearly equal (32/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 A (65/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno7 A significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (81/100 vs 31/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Oppo Reno7 A (82/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno7 A or the Poco F7?
The Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 A by 28 points (51/100 vs 23/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno7 A and the Poco F7?
The Oppo Reno7 A has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Poco F7 — 51/100.
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno7 A or the Poco F7?
The Poco F7 leads on performance (40/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno7 A over the Poco F7?
The Oppo Reno7 A is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco F7 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.