Oppo Reno5 4G vs Vivo V20

The Oppo Reno5 4G (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, while the Vivo V20 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo V20 leads — 49/100 vs 48/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno5 4G has the bigger battery (4310 mAh vs 4000); the Vivo V20 has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo Reno5 4G doesn't.

The Vivo V20 edges out the Oppo Reno5 4G by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Oppo Reno5 4G

Performance 41
Display 69
Camera 51
Battery 35
Portability 80
Value for money —

Vivo V20

Performance 41
Display 84
Camera 51
Battery 25
Portability 83
Value for money —

What makes Oppo Reno5 4G better?

  • Bigger battery: 4310 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 50W vs 33W

  • Longer battery life (35/100 vs 25/100)

What makes Vivo V20 better?


  • Better display (84/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better portability (83/100 vs 80/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Oppo Reno5 4G vs the Vivo V20, the Vivo V20 scores 1 points higher (49/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno5 4G leads (35/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 41/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo V20 notably outperforms the Oppo Reno5 4G (84/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100. In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno5 4G is a bit better (35/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo V20 and the Oppo Reno5 4G are nearly equal (83/100 vs 80/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Oppo Reno5 4G Vivo V20
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
AnTuTu 517460 517460
Geekbench Single 746 746
Geekbench Multi 1762 1762
Display 6.4" AMOLED 6.4" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1080x2400
Refresh rate 90 Hz —
Battery 4310 mAh 4000 mAh
Charging 50W 33W
Main camera 64 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Front camera 44 MP 44 MP
RAM 8GB 8GB
Storage 128GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 Android 11, Funtouch 11
Brightness (peak) 600 nits —
NFC no yes
Dimensions 159.1×73.3×7.7 mm 161.3×74.2×7.4 mm
Weight 171 g 171 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Oppo Reno5 4G

  • Main: 64MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 44MP
51
camera

Vivo V20

  • Main: 64MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 44MP
51
camera

Display comparison

Oppo Reno5 4G

  • 6.4" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
69
display

Vivo V20

  • 6.4" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
84
display

Battery and charging

Oppo Reno5 4G

  • 4310 mAh
  • Wired: 50W
  • No wireless charging
35
battery

Vivo V20

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
25
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Oppo Reno5 4G and Vivo V20, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Oppo Reno5 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
48/100
517460 AnTuTu
Vivo V20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
49/100
517460 AnTuTu

Equal performance based on benchmark results.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 41/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo V20 notably outperforms the Oppo Reno5 4G (84/100 vs 69/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno5 4G is a bit better (35/100 vs 25/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo V20 and the Oppo Reno5 4G are nearly equal (83/100 vs 80/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Oppo Reno5 4G or the Vivo V20?

The Vivo V20 edges out the Oppo Reno5 4G by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Oppo Reno5 4G and the Vivo V20?

The Oppo Reno5 4G has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Vivo V20 — 49/100.

Should you choose the Oppo Reno5 4G over the Vivo V20?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Vivo V20 (84/100 vs 69/100).