Oppo Reno2 F vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

The Oppo Reno2 F (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 34/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,294,871 vs 303,398); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo Reno2 F doesn't.

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno2 F by 37 points (71/100 vs 34/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Oppo Reno2 F

Performance 20
Display 82
Camera 34
Battery 22
Portability 54
Value for money —

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

Performance 68
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 56
Portability 52
Value for money —

What makes Oppo Reno2 F better?

  • Lighter: 195g vs 204g

  • Better display (82/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better portability (54/100 vs 52/100)

What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1294871 vs 303398
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1662 vs 341
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4188 vs 779
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 20W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 48MP

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 20/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 22/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Oppo Reno2 F vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 37 points higher (71/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (68/100 vs 20/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (56/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno2 F (68/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno2 F and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (82/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno2 F (86/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno2 F (56/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno2 F and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Oppo Reno2 F ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Processor MediaTek Helio P70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 303398 1294871
Geekbench Single 341 1662
Geekbench Multi 779 4188
Display 6.5" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 1116x2480
Refresh rate — 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 20W 80W
Main camera 48 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 16 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 18GB
Storage 128GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 9.0 (Pie); ColorOS 6.1 Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) — 1500 nits
NFC no yes
Dimensions 162.4×75.8×8.7 mm 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight 195 g 204 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Oppo Reno2 F

  • Main: 48MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
34
camera

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • Main: 64MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera

Display comparison

Oppo Reno2 F

  • 6.5" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: —
82
display

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Oppo Reno2 F

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • No wireless charging
22
battery

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Oppo Reno2 F and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Oppo Reno2 F MediaTek Helio P70
34/100
303398 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
71/100 +76.6%
1294871 AnTuTu

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Oppo Reno2 F by 76.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno2 F (68/100 vs 20/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno2 F and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (82/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno2 F (86/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno2 F (56/100 vs 22/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno2 F and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Oppo Reno2 F or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno2 F by 37 points (71/100 vs 34/100).

What is the rating of the Oppo Reno2 F and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Oppo Reno2 F has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno2 F or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno2 F or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (68/100 vs 20/100).

Should you choose the Oppo Reno2 F over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.