Oppo Reno16c vs Realme GT7
The Oppo Reno16c (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Realme GT7 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400e. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme GT7 leads — 77/100 vs 63/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Realme GT7 is faster in AnTuTu (2,496,976 vs 877,641).
Oppo Reno16c
Realme GT7
- Lighter: 195g vs 206g
- Better camera (64/100 vs 61/100)
- Better portability (57/100 vs 53/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2496976 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 2233 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 7478 vs 2813
- Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
- Higher performance (84/100 vs 55/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno16c vs the Realme GT7, the Realme GT7 scores 14 points higher (77/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT7 leads (84/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT7 leads (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT7 notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16c (84/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Realme GT7 and the Oppo Reno16c are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno16c and the Realme GT7 are nearly equal (64/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT7 notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16c (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16c and the Realme GT7 are nearly equal (57/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno16c | Realme GT7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 2496976 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 2233 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 7478 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 2780x1264 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | — | |
| Weight | 195 g | 206 g | |
| Launch price | — | $420 |
Oppo Reno16c
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Realme GT7
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo Reno16c
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme GT7
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2780x1264
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno16c
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Realme GT7
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Oppo Reno16c and Realme GT7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Realme GT7 leads Oppo Reno16c by 64.9% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo Reno16c
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Realme GT7 notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16c (84/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Realme GT7 and the Oppo Reno16c are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno16c and the Realme GT7 are nearly equal (64/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme GT7 notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16c (90/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16c and the Realme GT7 are nearly equal (57/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno16c or the Realme GT7?
The Realme GT7 is noticeably better than the Oppo Reno16c — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno16c and the Realme GT7?
The Oppo Reno16c has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Realme GT7 — 77/100.
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno16c or the Realme GT7?
The Realme GT7 leads on performance (84/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno16c over the Realme GT7?
The Oppo Reno16c is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme GT7 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.