OPPO Reno16 F vs Vivo X300 Pro
The OPPO Reno16 F (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $480 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 63/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 F has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 879,714); the OPPO Reno16 F is noticeably lighter (194g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 F
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes OPPO Reno16 F better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6510 mAh
- Lighter: 194g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $480 vs $899
- Better portability (58/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2813
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 F vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 25 points higher (88/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 68/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 F — 48/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 F (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 F are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 F (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 F notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (58/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 F | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.5×8.4 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $480 | $899 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 F
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 F
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 F
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 F and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads OPPO Reno16 F by 73.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $419. OPPO Reno16 F was $419 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 F (94/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 F are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 F (96/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 F notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (58/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 F or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 F by 25 points (88/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 F and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 F has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 F or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 F or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 F over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.